Case Library / Vishing (Voice Phishing) / South Africa's digital banking fraud surge: SABRIC's numbers (2023 to 2025)
Vishing (Voice Phishing) Documented incident

South Africa's digital banking fraud surge: SABRIC's numbers (2023 to 2025)

SABRIC recorded R2.4bn in South African digital banking fraud claims in 2025, driven by phishing, fake bank calls and SIM swaps. What the numbers mean.

Share:

Social Engineering Examples·10 sources

South Africa's digital banking fraud more than doubled in two years, by SABRIC's count. The South African Banking Risk Information Centre's 2025 report records R2,406,728,972 in client claims for digital banking crime in 2025, across 110,074 investigations. That's up 29.2% on 2024. SABRIC says social engineering, not hacked bank systems, drives most of it: phishing messages, phone calls from fake bank "fraud departments", and SIM swaps that steal one-time PINs. Status: Industry statistics; no single perpetrator.

Key takeaways

  • These are client claims reported by participating banks. Not recoveries, and not a full national total.
  • The totals cover all digital banking crime. They don't isolate vishing or SIM-swap losses.
  • About 70% of 2025 claims were on banking apps. SABRIC stresses that doesn't mean the apps were hacked.
  • The rule every bank repeats: no real bank will ask for your OTP, PIN or password by phone.

The numbers

Year Investigations Client claims
2023 52,588 R1,085,896,934
2024 97,547 R1,862,633,862
2025 110,074 R2,406,728,972

In 2025, banking apps made up R1,696,418,377 (70.5%), internet banking R688,287,956 (28.6%) and mobile banking R22,022,639 (0.9%).

A note on sources. SABRIC's earlier annual reports gave slightly different figures for 2023 and 2024. This page uses the comparative series in the 2025 report. A separate "R3.9 billion" figure that circulates hasn't had its scope confirmed, so it's left out.

How the scams work

Pattern What happens
Phishing, then a call An email or SMS that looks like your bank sends you to a fake login page. Soon after, a "fraud department" caller, with the bank's real number spoofed on caller ID, says your account is compromised and asks for the OTP to "secure" it. They use it on the spot
SIM swap Using stolen ID details, criminals convince a mobile network to move your number to their SIM. Every OTP now goes to them
"Safe account" call No phishing step. The caller talks you into moving money into a "secure" account, or approving an Instant Money or EFT payment, because yours is "under attack"

Standard Bank's Dr Belinda Rathogwa said scammers also went after older clients near retirement, with fake high-return investment pitches on top of the same urgent-call playbook. SABRIC and the banks have also pointed to AI-written phishing and early voice-cloning in some calls.

Tip: lost signal for no reason, or an OTP that never arrived? Absa warns that can mean a SIM swap. Call your network and your bank straight away.

The tells

  • A caller asking you to read out a PIN, password, OTP or CVV. Banks never do this.
  • Any instruction to move money into a new "safe" account.
  • Panic: "your account has been compromised", "we've detected fraud", "act now".
  • A caller who already knows some of your details. That isn't proof. It often comes from an earlier phishing message or a data breach.

What stops it

  • Hang up and call back on the number in your banking app or on the bank's website. Not a number the caller gives you.
  • Never share OTPs, PINs or passwords, by phone, SMS or email.
  • Don't tap links in unexpected SMS, WhatsApp or email messages about your account.
  • Use app-based or biometric checks where your bank offers them. Standard Bank added an in-app vishing alert in August 2024.
  • Get apps only from official stores.

Banks and SABRIC work with SAPS and the Southern African Fraud Prevention Service, which ran a "Just Say Goodbye" anti-vishing campaign in November 2025. No single gang or indictment is tied to the overall rise.

See also vishing examples and how to prevent vishing.

Common questions

How much digital banking fraud did SABRIC report for 2025?

R2,406,728,972 in client claims across 110,074 investigations, up 29.2% on 2024.

Are these all vishing losses?

No. The totals cover all digital banking crime reported by participating banks. They don't separate out vishing or SIM swaps.

Were South African banking apps hacked?

SABRIC says no. Most fraud starts outside the app, through impersonation and pressure, and the victim is then guided to act.

What is a SIM swap?

Criminals get your mobile number moved to their SIM card, so your bank's one-time PINs go to them.

Sources
Cite this case

Social Engineering Examples. “South Africa's digital banking fraud surge: SABRIC's numbers (2023 to 2025)”. Accessed 3 November 2026. https://socialengineeringexamples.com/sabric-vishing-sim-swap-banking-fraud-surge-2023-2025

Attack Chain & Defense
1Reconnaissance and data harvesting
What happened

SABRIC's reporting is consistent with attackers typically building a partial profile of the intended victim (name, bank, phone number, and some real account or personal details) from prior data breaches, social media, or a preceding phishing response, giving a later phone call enough real detail to sound legitimate.

The control that would have stopped it

personal-data exposure from social media and third-party data breaches is very hard for a bank to eliminate at the source; the realistic control assumes attackers already hold some real victim details and instead hardens the verification steps later in the chain that this information gets used against.

2Infrastructure and tooling setup
What happened

before contact, operators typically stand up look-alike phishing domains that closely mimic a bank's real login page and acquire caller-ID spoofing capability so a vishing call appears to originate from the bank's genuine fraud-department number; SABRIC's 2024 and 2025 statements describe criminals increasingly using generative-AI tools to draft error-free phishing emails and AI-generated WhatsApp lures, and early voice-cloning services to make follow-up calls more convincing.

The control that would have stopped it

the nearest practical controls sit at the mobile network operator (stronger identity verification, PIN, or biometric confirmation before any SIM port or number transfer is processed) and at brand-protection monitoring for newly registered look-alike banking domains, rather than at the tooling stage itself, which is largely invisible to the victim or bank beforehand.

3Phishing lead-in
What happened

a mass phishing email or SMS made to resemble legitimate bank communication is sent to a large pool of customers, directing anyone who clicks through to the spoofed banking site, where they unknowingly enter their username and password.

The control that would have stopped it

customer education to distrust links in unsolicited SMS, WhatsApp, or email and to navigate to banking sites directly or via the official app, combined with bank-side email-authentication standards (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) and a policy of never sending transactional login links, reduces how many recipients reach the spoofed page.

4Vishing call or SIM-swap execution
What happened

in the vishing path, a fraudster calls posing as bank fraud-department staff, using the spoofed caller ID and the details already gathered, and manufactures urgency to get the victim to read out an OTP or approve a transaction prompt; in the parallel SIM-swap path, the same harvested personal/ID information is used to convince a mobile network operator's customer-service agent to port the victim's number to a SIM the criminals control, silently rerouting future OTP/SMS codes.

The control that would have stopped it

SABRIC and every major bank's core, repeated advice is that a bank will never ask a customer to read out a PIN, password, OTP, or CVV by phone, and will never ask a customer to move money into a new 'safe' account; customers are told to hang up and call back only on the number from the bank's official app or website, never a number the caller supplies, and Absa specifically flags sudden loss of cellphone signal as a SIM-swap indicator to escalate to the network operator immediately.

5Account takeover or transaction authorization
What happened

the fraudster uses the stolen credentials together with the live-relayed OTP (vishing path) or the intercepted OTP stream (SIM-swap path) to log into the banking app or authorize a funds transfer in real time, completing the technical bypass of MFA.

The control that would have stopped it

authentication methods resistant to being relayed over a phone call, such as in-app push approvals that display the actual transaction details for the customer to confirm, biometric verification, and Standard Bank's dedicated in-app vishing-alert feature (launched Aug 2024), are harder for a live vishing caller to talk a victim through than a plain numeric OTP.

6Funds movement and objective completion
What happened

SABRIC describes the proceeds typically being moved quickly into money-mule accounts or via Instant Money/EFT payments to frustrate tracing, which is consistent with why, per Standard Bank's Rathogwa, most victims recover little or none of the money even with bank assistance.

The control that would have stopped it

bank and SABRIC-level transaction monitoring, mule-account detection, and cross-bank/SAPS collaboration can sometimes freeze or trace funds quickly, but SABRIC's own outcome data shows this rarely helps individual victims recover money once funds have moved, since the customer authorized the transaction themselves under deception; this stage is where the case's own reporting shows the defense is weakest in practice.

Quick Facts
Victim
Customers of South Africa's major retail banks, collectively Absa, First National Bank
(FNB), Nedbank, and Standard Bank, plus other SABRIC member banks, targeted individually at scale rather than the banks' own IT infrastructure being breached.
Location
South Africa
(nationwide; SABRIC notes more than half of associated-crime incidents concentrated in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal)
Date
2023-01-01 to 2025-12-31; SABRIC's 2025 Annual Banking Crime Statistics Report was subsequently published in 2026
Impact
SABRIC's 2025 report presents a participating-member Digital Banking Crime series of 52,588 client-claim investigations and R1,085,896,934 in 2023, 97,547 and R1,862,633,862 in 2024, and 110,074 and R2,406,728,972 in 2025.
BasisreportedClient claim amounts and client-claim investigations reported by participating SABRIC members; not a complete measure across every bank or financial institution in South Africa
It reports 29.2% growth in the 2025 amount. These are client claims, not recoveries or a complete national total, and the aggregate is not a vishing-only or SIM-swap-only loss measure. The 2025 comparative series differs from the earlier reports' figures quoted in the historical verification record; this case now explicitly uses the 2025 series rather than treating the earlier published values as transcription errors.
Status
Documented incident
Case Type
Real-World Incident
Sector
Financial Services & Insurance
Threat Actor
Organized Crime
Explore more

Related Cases

Browse by what this case has in common with others in the library.