Case Library / Vishing (Voice Phishing) / The Saskatchewan "AI grandparent scam": what a judge said and what police could prove (2025 to 2026)
Vishing (Voice Phishing) Documented incident

The Saskatchewan "AI grandparent scam": what a judge said and what police could prove (2025 to 2026)

A judge called it an AI-driven fraud, but police couldn't confirm voice cloning. How the Saskatchewan grandparent scam worked and how a lawyer's call cracked it.

Share:

Social Engineering Examples·8 sources

Was it really an AI grandparent scam? A Saskatchewan judge thought so. Between late November and early December 2025, seniors in Saskatoon, Regina and the White Butte area got calls from a crying "grandchild" who needed bail money, then from a fake police officer and a fake lawyer. Cash went to a courier at the door or by Purolator. Two Quebec residents who did the pickups, Ciprian Teodor and Alexandra Condurache, were arrested on 2 December 2025 and later sentenced. At Teodor's sentencing in July 2026, the judge called him "the human face of an otherwise faceless, AI-driven fraud." Status: Convicted and sentenced.

Key takeaways

  • The judge said AI was used. Police had said they couldn't tell if voices were cloned or details just lifted from social media.
  • No voice analysis was presented. The AI finding came from agreed facts in a joint submission.
  • The scam was caught at its most physical step: the cash pickup.
  • One target broke it open by calling the real lawyer whose name the scammers had used.

How the calls worked

Stage What victims heard
The grandchild A crying voice saying they'd been arrested for drugs, or caused a crash with a pregnant woman, and needed bail
The officer A fake police officer took over
The lawyer A fake lawyer, in one case using the surname of a real Regina defence lawyer, gave instructions
The cover story Tell the bank teller the cash is for a renovation contractor. Tell nobody else, there's a gag order
The handover Cash in a box on the doorstep, handed to a courier, or sent by Purolator

One senior said the voice matched her granddaughter "to perfection". That impression is the strongest evidence anywhere in the case for a synthetic voice.

Tip: a call from a grandchild in trouble? Hang up and ring them, or their parents, on a number you already have. Then decide.

How they were caught

One Regina woman noticed the courier had left no receipt. She called the real lawyer whose name had been used. He told her, within moments, that no lawyer asks for cash in a box on a doorstep. Separately, a Regina couple in their seventies took out cash, grew suspicious and called police before handing anything over.

Saskatoon police had already tipped off Regina about a similar spree the week before. Regina officers watched a matching vehicle, saw it collect cash from another victim's home, and arrested the pair on 2 December 2025, finding cash and other evidence inside.

Date Event
24 to 27 November 2025 Five Saskatoon reports, losses over $45,000
1 to 2 December 2025 Five Regina victims and one in White Butte, losses over $40,000. About $20,000 later recovered
2 December 2025 Teodor (50) and Condurache (40) arrested
December 2025 Condurache, mainly the driver, gets a two-year conditional sentence served in the community, plus three years' probation
9 July 2026 Teodor, who did the pickups and whom the Crown called the scam's leader, gets 18 months' jail plus three years' probation. Six of those months relate to a separate Quebec bank-card fraud where he drove for five pickups

Restitution of $46,350 was ordered for the Saskatchewan victims: $28,100 from Teodor alone and $18,250 from both. The Crown said that was the money never recovered. Teodor's convictions covered eleven victims, each defrauded of more than $5,000. One couple lost over $25,000 in several payments. The people who made the calls were never identified.

Was AI really involved?

Ten days after the arrests, Regina police Sgt. Dave Krieger said investigators were "not certain" whether the suspects cloned voices or "had just harvested key details off social media." Seven months later, Judge James Rybchuk concluded AI had been used. But he didn't say it was voice cloning, no technical basis was reported, and the facts were agreed in a joint submission rather than argued in court. Only one reporter's account of his remarks has been published.

So the lesson cuts two ways. AI voice scams are real. And "AI was used" can end up on the court record without anyone testing it. See voice cloning and vishing examples.

What stops it

  • Call the family member back on a number you know, or check with other relatives, before sending a cent.
  • Secrecy and gag orders are the red flag.
  • Nobody legitimate collects bail in cash at your door, or by courier parcel.
  • A "lawyer" or "officer" joining the call adds pressure, not proof.
  • Look up the lawyer or police number yourself and call it. That's what cracked this case.

Common questions

Did the Quebec grandparent scam use AI voice cloning?

Unproven. The judge said AI was used but didn't mention voice cloning, and police said they couldn't confirm it.

Who was sentenced?

Ciprian Teodor got 18 months' jail plus probation in July 2026. Alexandra Condurache got a two-year conditional sentence plus probation in December 2025.

How much did victims lose?

Police reported over $45,000 in Saskatoon and over $40,000 in Regina and White Butte. Restitution of $46,350 was ordered for money not recovered.

How was the scam stopped?

A suspicious target called the real lawyer, police shared a tip, and officers caught the pair during a pickup.

Sources
  • Warning: Increase in emergency "Grandparent" fraud reports: Be aware!. Royal Canadian Mounted Police (Saskatchewan) (primary). Official RCMP public-safety release on the grandparent-fraud spree; confirmed 5 Regina + 1 White Butte victims, $40,000+ lost, ~$20,000 recovered, Teodor/Condurache charges and Dec 2-3, 2025 arrest/first-appearance dates
  • Two Arrested in Grandparent Scam. Saskatoon Police Service (primary). Police release on the Saskatoon-area frauds and arrests; confirmed 5 reports Nov 24-27, over $45,000 lost, individual losses $5,000-$26,000
  • Fraud Warning: Emergency Scams. Regina Police Service (background). Police public-warning page describing general emergency/grandparent scam tactics, published March 26, 2025, eight months before this incident and covering a separate spree; supports no case-specific fact and is cited only for the generic tactic pattern
  • Grandparent scammer sentenced to jail by Sask. judge. Regina Leader-Post (secondary). Court-attended reporting on the July 9, 2026 sentencing by Brandon Harder, quoting prosecutor, defense, and judge directly; confirmed 18-month sentence, 212 days remaining, $46,350 restitution breakdown, Quebec fraud tie-in, and both judicial quotes verbatim. Sole source for the judge's AI conclusion, which it reports as "concluded artificial intelligence (AI) was employed in the scam" with no reference to voice cloning
  • Man and woman from Quebec sentenced for roles in Saskatchewan grandparent scam. 980 CJME / 650 CKOM, Libby Gray (secondary). The only account built on the court file; confirmed the eleven convicted-count victims (five Saskatoon, five Regina, one Balgonie), the restitution breakdown of $21,700 plus $6,400 plus $18,250 joint, Condurache's December 2025 sentencing and conditions, and the Crown describing Teodor as the leader of the scam. Reports no AI conclusion
  • Quebec man sentenced to jail for Regina grandparent scam. 620 CKRM, Lisa Joy (secondary). Same-day report on the July 9, 2026 sentencing; confirmed 212 days and the December 2025 stay of charges against Condurache. Reports no AI conclusion, and gives the fine as $2,800 where CJME's court documents give $1,200, a discrepancy this file does not resolve and therefore states no fine
  • 'That was my granddaughter's voice': Senior suspects scammers used AI in Regina, Saskatoon. CBC News, Dan Zakreski, December 12, 2025 (secondary). Detailed account from the targeted Regina couple, the impersonated lawyer's confirmation, and the police surveillance and arrest narrative; confirmed Sgt. Dave Krieger's statement that investigators could not confirm AI voice cloning against social-media detail harvesting. The voice-cloning claim in this story is the targeted senior's own impression, not a police or court conclusion
  • Quebec man accused of grandparent scams in Saskatoon, Regina. The StarPhoenix (secondary). Arrest and initial-charges coverage; confirmed charge counts and cross-referenced Saskatoon, Regina and White Butte victim breakdown, and records that this was not the first Quebec grandparent-scam ring prosecuted in Saskatchewan
Cite this case

Social Engineering Examples. “The Saskatchewan "AI grandparent scam": what a judge said and what police could prove (2025 to 2026)”. Accessed 3 November 2026. https://socialengineeringexamples.com/quebec-ai-grandparent-vishing-teodor-condurache-saskatchewan-2025

Attack Chain & Defense
1Target selection and family profiling
What happened

the callers had enough detail about elderly targets and their grandchildren to be believed, and targets described the voice as identical to their grandchild's, including mannerisms. How that was achieved is not established by any source: investigators said they were not certain whether the suspects used AI to clone family members' voices or had just harvested key details from social media, and no source describes a voice sample, a collection method, or a tool.

The control that would have stopped it

family-facing exposure through social media and public records is very hard to eliminate at the individual level, and the defense does not depend on knowing how the voice was produced. Partial mitigation includes limiting public posting of family voice and video and, where practical, agreeing on a family safe word in advance, but the reliable control assumes attackers already sound convincing and hardens the verification step instead, at Stage 3.

2Pretext scripting and role assignment
What happened

the ring built a multi-person, escalating script (panicked grandchild, then a fake police officer, then a fake lawyer) and assigned scripted roles, in at least one case borrowing the surname of a real local defense lawyer to add false legitimacy.

The control that would have stopped it

police public-safety releases (RCMP, Saskatoon Police, Regina Police) specifically publicized the multi-persona escalation pattern (grandchild, then police officer, then lawyer) as a recognizable fraud signature, so awareness of this exact structure is itself a documented counter-measure.

3Initial vishing contact and panic induction
What happened

callers used the impersonated voice to describe a fabricated emergency (arrest, car accident involving injury) and induce fear and urgency before requesting bail or legal-fee money.

The control that would have stopped it

RCMP and municipal police publicized the core defense of hanging up and independently calling the family member back on a number already known to be theirs before taking any action or sending money, rather than trusting the incoming call.

4Authority-escalation handoff
What happened

the call was transferred mid-conversation to a fake police officer and then a fake lawyer, adding perceived legitimacy and pressure to comply.

The control that would have stopped it

police guidance urged treating any mid-call transfer to a supposed police officer or lawyer as a red flag rather than added legitimacy, and independently looking up and calling that person's or agency's official number, exactly as the Regina woman did when she tracked down and called the real lawyer whose name had been borrowed.

5Isolation and compliance coaching
What happened

victims were instructed to keep the request secret (citing a supposed gag order), told what cover story to give a bank teller, and given specific cash-withdrawal amounts and secrecy conditions.

The control that would have stopped it

publicized guidance told victims to be automatically suspicious of any request for secrecy or a "gag order" and to tell a bank teller or another family member regardless of the caller's instructions; bank staff trained to probe the stated purpose of large, unusual cash withdrawals add a further check at this stage.

6Cash-logistics setup
What happened

victims were told not to deliver money in person at a courthouse but instead to leave cash in a box on their doorstep for a courier, or to ship follow-up payments via a parcel courier service (Purolator).

The control that would have stopped it

police warnings specifically flagged requests to leave cash in a box for pickup or to ship it via parcel courier as a fraud indicator, since no legitimate legal or law-enforcement process works this way.

7In-person or parcel cash collection (payout)
What happened

Teodor physically collected cash directly from victims' homes while Condurache drove, or the money was received via parcel service, completing the fraud; this collection step is also where police surveillance intercepted and arrested the pair mid-pickup.

The control that would have stopped it

the physical cash-pickup step is the fraud's most exposed and prosecutable point; in this case it was disrupted by coordinated police surveillance (acting on a cross-jurisdiction tip and a targeted senior's report) that intercepted and arrested the pair mid-pickup.

Quick Facts
Victim
Eleven elderly Saskatchewan victims on the counts Teodor was convicted of, five in Saskatoon, five in Regina, and one in Balgonie, each defrauded of more than $5,000, according to court records reported by 650 CKOM.
Police releases place the eleventh in the White Butte area, which is the RCMP detachment covering Balgonie. Others were targeted without loss: the joint charges included two counts of attempt fraud over $5,000, and a Regina couple in their seventies who described the calls to CBC News withdrew cash but grew suspicious and called police before any handover. Calls ran from late November to early December 2025
Location
Saskatoon, Regina, and the White Butte area, Saskatchewan, Canada
(perpetrators traveled from and reside in Quebec, near Montreal)
Date
Scam calls and losses: November 24 to December 2, 2025 (Saskatoon reports November 24 to 27; Regina and White Butte reports December 1 to 2).
Arrests: December 2, 2025. First court appearance: December 3, 2025. Condurache: several charges stayed December 12, 2025, sentenced in Regina Provincial Court in December 2025. Teodor sentencing: July 9, 2026, Regina Provincial Court.
Impact
Restitution ordered at sentencing: $46,350 total for the Saskatchewan offences (Teodor solely responsible for $28,100; Teodor and Condurache jointly responsible for a further $18,250), described by the Crown as the amount never recovered by victims.
BasismeasuredRestitution ordered at sentencing, described as the amount never recovered
Separately reported raw loss figures: Saskatoon victims (5 reports, Nov. 24-27, 2025) lost a total of more than $45,000, with individual losses of roughly $5,000-$26,000; Regina/White Butte victims (Dec. 1-2, 2025) lost in excess of $40,000, of which about $20,000 was later recovered by police. One couple alone lost over $25,000 through multiple payments (first handed to a courier in person, then sent via Purolator). Most other individual instances involved losses under $10,000. Teodor's overall 18-month sentence also incorporated a separate Quebec bank-card-retrieval fraud operation (200+ victims, over $1 million in total losses) in which he played a limited role as a driver in five card pickups; six months of his sentence was attributed to that role.
Status
Documented incident
Case Type
Real-World Incident
Sector
Consumer / General Public
Threat Actor
Organized Crime
Explore more

Related Cases

Browse by what this case has in common with others in the library.