FraudGPT was sold at $200 a month as an unrestricted AI for phishing. When Cisco Talos tried to buy it, the logins were dead. What that tells us.
Social Engineering Examples·9 sources
FraudGPT was sold in mid-2023 as "ChatGPT with no boundaries" for criminals: $200 a month or $1,700 a year for a bot that would write phishing emails, build fake login pages, churn out malware and find cardable websites. A seller using the alias CanadianKingpin12 pushed it on a Telegram channel created on 23 June 2023 and across half a dozen dark-web markets, claiming more than 3,000 sales. Security firm Netenrich documented the listings on 25 July 2023 and the name went everywhere. Then in 2025 Cisco Talos tried to actually buy it. The login details they were given didn't work. The seller asked for more crypto to pay for a "crack". Talos concluded there was probably no product at all. Status: Seller unidentified; no confirmed attack ever tied to FraudGPT output; assessed by Talos as a scam on criminals.
| Claim | Detail from the listings |
|---|---|
| Where sold | Telegram (channel created 23 June 2023) and dark-web markets including Empire, WHM, Torrez, World, AlphaBay and Versus |
| Price | $200 a month or $1,700 a year. Security Affairs reported an unverified $1,000 six-month tier |
| Features promised | Spear-phishing and BEC emails, malicious code, "undetectable" malware, phishing pages and panels, scam letters, non-VBV bin lookup, cardable-site discovery, leak and vulnerability search, code obfuscation, OTP-spoofing bots, CVV checking, 24/7 escrow |
| Social proof | "3,000+ confirmed sales/reviews", per the seller. Unverified |
| Coming soon | SlashNext reported the seller's claims of two more bots in development, "DarkBART" and "DarkBERT", with internet access and image features |
Netenrich framed FraudGPT as a sibling of WormGPT, which SlashNext had reported on 13 July 2023, and floated a possible link between the two operators while being clear that was speculation. Netenrich also said it knew of no confirmed attack using FraudGPT content. The day after its report, FBI Director Christopher Wray warned publicly about criminals using generative AI for malware and spear phishing, without naming any product.
Tip: a feature list is not a demo. If nobody outside the seller has shown the tool producing anything, treat the capability as unproven.
Two years later, Cisco Talos did what nobody else had: tried to buy it. After a long negotiation on Telegram, CanadianKingpin12 handed over a username and password for the FraudGPT site. They didn't work. The seller's answer was to ask for cryptocurrency to buy a "crack" for the login page.
That's an advance-fee scam with the goalposts moved. Talos found other would-be buyers on the same forums reporting the same experience and assessed that the actor had no working product and was simply taking money from other criminals under the FraudGPT name. Outpost24 separately noted a spread of fake Telegram channels promising tools that never arrived.
One caveat. Rapid7's June 2026 report on the criminal AI market gives a different account of FraudGPT's capabilities. It doesn't, though, independently establish that the original 2023 offering worked. The honest summary is that the strongest hands-on evidence says scam, and nobody has produced evidence to the contrary.
FraudGPT sits in almost every threat-intel slide deck from 2023 as proof that AI was lowering the bar for phishing. It may be better evidence of something else: how quickly an unverified underground advert becomes an industry fact.
There are two social-engineering layers here. The advertised one, AI making lures more convincing at scale, is real as a category even if this product wasn't. The demonstrated one is that the market for criminal AI tools runs on the same urgency, scarcity and fake social proof as any scam aimed at the public. The marks were just other criminals.
See also AI-generated malware, agentic AI attacks and phishing.
A subscription "criminal ChatGPT" advertised from June 2023 on Telegram and dark-web markets for $200 a month, promising phishing emails, malware and fake pages. Security firm Netenrich publicised it on 25 July 2023.
Probably not. When Cisco Talos tried to buy access in 2025 it received non-working credentials and a demand for more cryptocurrency. Talos assessed the operator was scamming buyers. No confirmed attack has been tied to FraudGPT output.
An actor using the alias CanadianKingpin12. The real identity has never been publicly confirmed. A suggested link to the WormGPT operator was explicitly unconfirmed.
No figure has been published. The seller claimed over 3,000 sales, which is unverified.
Social Engineering Examples. “FraudGPT: the $200-a-month "criminal ChatGPT" that was probably a scam itself (2023)”. Accessed 3 November 2026. https://socialengineeringexamples.com/fraudgpt-underground-chatbot-2023
CanadianKingpin12 built a dark-web storefront and marketing materials for FraudGPT, positioning it as an unrestricted, jailbroken-style ChatGPT alternative, and advertised it through cybercrime forums and a Telegram channel created 2023-06-23, per SlashNext and Netenrich.
Attacker-controlled marketing infrastructure on dark-web forums and Telegram is largely outside a defender's reach to remove; the realistic control is threat-intelligence monitoring of these channels (as Netenrich and SlashNext did) to get early warning of new 'AI cybercrime tool' claims so downstream anti-phishing controls can be validated rather than the tool itself chased.
The actor claimed 'verified vendor' status on several named dark-web marketplaces and an unverified '3,000+ confirmed sales/reviews' track record, manufacturing trust signals for prospective cybercriminal buyers before any transaction took place.
Treat 'verified vendor' badges and bulk sales-count claims on cybercrime forums as unverifiable marketing rather than evidence of legitimacy or capability; require independent corroboration from a second source before treating any such claim as fact.
FraudGPT was advertised with a detailed capability list (phishing pages/panels, BEC email drafting, malware generation, CVV/carding tools, 24/7 escrow) at $200/month or $1,700/year, giving prospective buyers a concrete, appealing value proposition to act on.
Evaluate advertised capabilities against actual observed samples or independent testing rather than a feature list, and remember that standard anti-phishing and anti-BEC controls (DMARC/SPF/DKIM, link sandboxing, awareness training) work the same regardless of whether a lure claims AI origin.
The actor engaged interested buyers, including Cisco Talos researchers acting as prospective buyers in 2025, one-on-one over Telegram, with prolonged back-and-forth negotiation that built apparent rapport and momentum toward a purchase.
Build a structured verification step, proof of function before payment, into any acquisition process, and treat a seller's urgency or relationship-building pressure as a caution flag rather than a reason to move faster; this applies equally to a legitimate buyer being scammed as it does to phishing targets in general.
After negotiation concluded, the actor supplied a username and password for the FraudGPT site, but per Talos the credentials did not work, creating a plausible-sounding technical snag rather than an outright refusal to deliver.
A broken or non-functioning deliverable that follows a completed negotiation is a hallmark advance-fee-fraud indicator; the practical control is to walk away at this point rather than troubleshoot alongside the seller.
CanadianKingpin12 then asked the buyer to send cryptocurrency to purchase a 'crack' to fix the broken login, exploiting the momentum from the earlier negotiation to seek payment.
Any request for a further payment to 'unlock,' 'crack,' or 'activate' something already paid for should be treated as a stop signal; legitimate vendors do not require serial follow-up payments to deliver access already sold.
Talos concluded from the non-working credentials and cryptocurrency demand that CanadianKingpin12 had no working product; several other victims separately confirmed being scammed when they tried to purchase access.
Once cryptocurrency is sent, recovery is rarely practical because the payment is irreversible; the only effective control is preventing the payment at Stages 4 through 6, which is why verification has to happen before funds move, not after.
Browse by what this case has in common with others in the library.
Prosecutors allege a Ghana-based network used fake female personas, AI video and inheritance stories to take $8M+ from 80+ elderly…
Fraudsters faked WPP CEO Mark Read on WhatsApp and staged a Teams call with a cloned executive voice. The agency…
A job candidate at Vidoc Security Lab hid behind a real-time face filter and refused to cover his face. What…
A Lapsus$ affiliate used a contractor's stolen Uber password, likely bought on the dark web, flooded them with MFA push…
In 2015, fake emails from Ubiquiti's CEO and a real London lawyer got its finance chief to wire $46.7M. How…
A victim searching for the AnyDesk remote-access tool hit a typosquatted site with a fake Cloudflare Turnstile that, instead of…
Fugitive hacker Kevin Mitnick impersonated a vacationing Novell employee on a "top-secret" project, defeated a support analyst's voicemail-based identity check…
Sysdig says an AI agent ran the JADEPUFFER ransomware attack end to end: unpatched Langflow, stolen secrets, 1,342 configs destroyed.…
Toronto firm CoHost spent two months interviewing a candidate it now believes was a fabricated persona with fake references. The…
An attacker sent a LastPass employee WhatsApp calls and a voicemail using an AI copy of the CEO's voice. The…
Noma Security hid a prompt injection in a Salesforce web form and made Agentforce leak CRM data to a $5…
Anthropic says a UK cybercriminal used Claude to build ransomware they couldn't write alone, then sold kits for $400 to…
In July 2020, callers posing as Twitter IT stole staff logins and hit 130 accounts, from Obama to Musk, with…
A Tennessee school district's finance director wired $3.36M in state education funds to fraudsters impersonating textbook vendor Pearson from a…
Toronto firm CoHost spent two months interviewing a candidate it now believes was a fabricated persona with fake references. The…
An unidentified operator jailbroke Anthropic's Claude Code with a fake "authorized bug bounty and penetration test" pretext, then defeated its…
An Atlantic City woman called grieving widows posing as a life insurer, demanding gift cards to clear policy "arrears". 17+…